Re: how to do 'deep queries'?
От | Anthony Molinaro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: how to do 'deep queries'? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C6C2B281FD3E74C9F7C9D5B1EDA4582182585@wgexch01.wgenhq.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | how to do 'deep queries'? (jeff sacksteder <jsacksteder@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
> Well, perhaps you will one day and a developer will hose your server > with a "accidental" cross join and then you will understand. Hehe :)) hey man, that's what testing and code review is all about (dev teams still do that don't they?) Accidental cartesians don't get to production ;) Regards, Anthony -----Original Message----- From: Daryl Richter [mailto:daryl@brandywine.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:35 AM To: Anthony Molinaro Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] how to do 'deep queries'? Anthony Molinaro wrote:> Daryl,>>>>Whether you feel that is unnecessary or not, it *is* the ANSI Standard>>>>and is thus, by definition, "how queries should be written.">>> I disagree 100%. Oracle and db2 introduced windowfunctions years> before> Ansi added them. Should we not have used them? It absurd to avoid using> a feature cuz it's not ansi.> Of course it would be absurd, I have not suggested otherwise. Joins are not a *new* feature. > Honestly, Don't be a slave to ansi, you miss out on all the great> vendor specific functionality *that you're already payingfor*>>>>it was added to make the *intention* of the query clearer.>>> More clearer to whom?>> Certainly not developerswho have been working for many years> using the old syntax.>> The intention of the old syntax is perfect. Realizethat the problem is> not the old syntax, the problem is the watered down database field> today.> I see this more and more with each interviewI conduct looking> for dba's and developers.> I generally agree with your assessment of the state of database knowledge (particularly re developers). It is, however, the reality we live in. [snipped nostalgia and back-patting] > I've never worked in a place that used ANSI only syntax and I've never> had a problem with clarity nor any developers I've worked with.> So, I don't at all get what you're saying... > Old style is short and sweet and perfect.> Ansi dumbed it down, that's the bottom line.> And for people who've been developingfor sometime,> It's wholly unnecessary.> Well, perhaps you will one day and a developer will hose your server with a "accidental" cross join and then you will understand. But hopefully not. ;) > Regards,> Anthony> [rest snipped] -- Daryl Director of Technology (( Brandywine Asset Management ) ( "Expanding the Science of Global Investing" ) ( http://www.brandywine.com ))
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: