Re: Maximum Performance
От | Luis Amigo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Maximum Performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C500209.76DF3D44@atc.unican.es обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Maximum Performance ("Jean Huveneers" <j.huveneers@farcourier.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Manuel Trujillo wrote: > El jue, 24-01-2002 a las 09:27, Luis Amigo escribió: > > On my own experience I will tell you that if you're able to force postgres > > to keep all database in memory it will be very fast, so memory only depends > > on your > > database size. > > Each backend may run on a different processor, so the more processors u > > have the more backends u can run at once > > hope it helps > > Yes, but... How can I know the exact size of my database? And, if I > compile the postgresql under four processors, don't work like (or in a) > SMP, distributing the charge into the four processors?? > > -- > Manuel Trujillo manueltrujillo@dorna.es > Technical Engineer http://www.motograndprix.com > Dorna Sports S.L. +34 93 4702864 Si prefieres hablamos en español. we're currently working on a 8-processor sgi server with irix by now each backend run in one processor there is no load balance the amount of memory u will need is as I know (table size+indexes size) they are in your base directory, if u can afford it then u will be working on memory but fsync and walfiles hope it help
Вложения
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: