Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | mlw |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C4DC155.CF62F565@mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Clift wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have an addition for it : > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > <snip> > > > > > > 1) Q: Why does PostgreSQL have a BSD license? > > > A: PostgreSQL was developed at Berkeley and open-sourced under the > > > BSD license. That license has served us well over many years. > > > > > > 2) Q: Why does PostgreSQL not have a GPL license? > > > A: See (1) > > 3) Q: Can I try and convince you guys to use the GPL, or maybe even just > add the GPL to PostgreSQL? > A: No. You will be ignored and/or flamed depending on how people > feel at the time. > > Probably flamed. > > And probably with enthusiasm. :) > > Don't do it. 4) Q: Why is it when I try to convince you guys to use the GPL, my email server gets clobbered for days. A: See 3.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: