Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C4D76AA.B5F2F38D@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
... > And now you know why I wanted the word "many" in there. I understand that. My point is that we are dancing around trying to find acceptable wording for a line of explanation that simply should not be there in the first place. Why bother mentioning "many find GPL unacceptable", no matter what alternate phrasing is found, when the issue for everyone with the project can boil down to much simpler, more fundamental reasons peculiar to PostgreSQL itself: PostgreSQL was given to us by Berkeley with the BSD license, and that license has served us well. No need to explain acceptable vs unacceptable, no need to decide whether there are a few, some, many, or all developers feeling GPL is unacceptable, no need for any of that. I don't mean to be argumentative here (and hope I'm not) but it seems we are stretching to find wording for a possibly controversial area which is moot since there are other fundamental reasons for enjoying the license we have. - Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: