Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C4CC4B2.B449F769@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. While the > GPL has similar goals, PostgreSQL developers find the restrictions > imposed by the GPL to be unacceptable. Since the BSD license has no > such restrictions, we like it and have no intention of changing it. If you feel you must bother to mention this whole sordid topic somewhere in the documentation, I much prefer the already-suggested, non-judgemental wording (by Mitch Vincent and others) of something like: Postgres has been developed and released under the BSD license from its inception. Code contributed to the main distribution is assumed to be, and must be, released under this same license. Frankly, I'm not sure why I should be uncomfortable with GPL, and I'm not sure that a FAQ should presume to explain why I am, especially if I am not. But I *am* comfortable with the ground rules of PostgreSQL which have been there since the beginning and with which we have seen tremendous growth and maturity of the project and product. Good enough for me ;) - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: