Re: pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/windev README.txt bi ...
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/windev README.txt bi ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C3E6D4E.8A579D46@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/windev README.txt bi ... (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc/windev README.txt bi ...
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Why don't you just make a branch and merge > >> it after 7.3 is branched? > > > Yes it's similar. However is it allowed to make such a > > branch in the first place ? > > Sure, CVS supports that. What I meant was if PostgreSQL team allows it as the policy ? > However: the only reason I can see for putting stuff into CVS is for > cooperative development. The only but very significant reason I can see about psqlodbc CVS is that people can see (nearly) up to date source at the official place. People can compile it by themselves and try it. There aren't so many reasons that the released version is more stable than that of cvs as for psqlodbc. The longer(unfortunately beta has always long) I keep my changes privately, the less the cvs stuff has its meaning. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: