Re: best way to use bitvarying?
| От | Barry Lind |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: best way to use bitvarying? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3C3B313B.1000808@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: best way to use bitvarying? (Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Laurette, bytea is supported in 7.2, and the 7.2 drivers will work against either a 7.1 or 7.2 database. You can download the latest 7.2 drivers from jdbc.postgresql.org. thanks, --Barry Laurette Cisneros wrote: > Last I was hearing (see http://lab.applinet.nl/postgresql-jdbc/#Lob) "bytea > is currently unsupported in the jdbc interface". Is this not true for 7.2? > Is there a suggested way of using this with jdbc? > > Thanks for the help, > > L. > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > > >>Laurette Cisneros <laurette@nextbus.com> writes: >> >>>We would like to store *small* images into bitvarying fields. >>> >>Wouldn't BYTEA be a better choice? Do you really want to treat the data >>a bit at a time, rather than a byte at a time? >> >> regards, tom lane >> >> >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: