Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C155914.BD00207C@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
... > Declaring the lock pointer "volatile" seems to prevent this misbehavior. Great. That is what it is anyway, right? > Personally I'd call this a compiler bug; isn't it supposed to consider > semicolons as sequence points? I never heard that rearranging the order > of stores into memory was considered a kosher optimization of C code. Sure it is. Presumably "-O0" or equivalent would have kept this from happening, but seemingly unrelated stores into non-overlapping memory are always fair game at even modest levels of optimization. The "x = 0" is cheaper than the other operations, though it may be reordered for internal RISC-y reasons rather than "cheapest first" considerations. - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: