Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C0C9207.174C64CA@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98 (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > > Sent: 04 December 2001 02:53 > > To: mlw > > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org > > Subject: Re: FW: [CYGWIN] 7.2b3 postmaster doesn't start on Win98 > > > > > > mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes: > > > I'll write and test something with cygwin this week if that would > > > help. (If someone can get to it first it is something stupid like > > > "GetWindowsVersion()" or something like that. > > > > Well, the non-stupid part is to know which return values > > correspond to Windows versions that have proper file > > permissions and which values to versions that don't. IIRC, it depends also on filesystem, i.e. FAT32 on NT/2000 dos still not have proper permissions. > > Given > > that NT and the other versions are two separate code streams > > (no?), I'm not sure that distinguishing this is trivial, and > > even less sure that we should assume all future Windows > > releases will have it. I'd be more comfortable with an autoconf-like > > approach: actually probe the desired feature and see if it works. > > > > I was thinking this morning about trying to chmod the > > directory and, if that doesn't report an error, assuming that > > all is well. On Windows it'd presumably claim success > > despite not being able to do what is asked for. But this > > would definitely require testing. > > It does (at least on my systems). It does what ? Report an error, claim success or need testing ? -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: