Re: Call for platform testing
От | Luis Amigo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for platform testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C053489.FEA23CE1@atc.unican.es обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for platform testing (Horak Daniel <horak@sit.plzen-city.cz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Luis Amigo <lamigo@atc.unican.es> writes: > > again join and geometry(it also failed in postgres 7.1.3) > > The join discrepancy is probably an artifact of your local qsort() > behaving slightly differently for equal keys than everyone else's. > Curious that it only affects these few queries, though. > > Geometry differences in the low-order digits are par for the course. > I wouldn't even stop to think about it, except that I see that you > are already using a platform-specific geometry comparison file > (geometry-irix.out). Some digging in the CVS logs and mail archives > shows that that file was submitted by Pete Forman in Oct 2000, and > he was using > > > Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : SGI MIPS 8000 > > > > Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : IRIX 6.5.5m > > > > PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.1): PostgreSQL-7.1 > > > > Compiler used (example: gcc 2.8.0): MIPSPro 7.3 > > Not clear at this point if the differences in your results are due to > hardware, library version, or compiler version differences. > > regards, tom lane I've reviewed the results, join differences seem to be conceptual differences, expected result gives higher value to NULL that 0 (personally I think 0 is bigger than NULL). Geometry differences are architectural round up differences (I think that MIPS 10000 and 12000 may have corrected previous errors or might be a different point-of-view about rounding)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: