Re: JDBC inserts on views using rules
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC inserts on views using rules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BEC2C78.4000604@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JDBC inserts on views using rules (Stuart Robinson <stuart@zapata.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC inserts on views using rules
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Stuart, What is the sql statement you are issuing that is causing this error. Without seeing the sql statement I am having a difficult time understanding exactly what you are trying to do. thanks, --Barry Stuart Robinson wrote: > I sent this to the general mailing list, but I thought it might be > appropriate for this forum, since it does relate to the JDBC. > > Regards, > Stuart Robinson > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 23:51:33 -0800 (PST) > From: Stuart Robinson <stuart@zapata.org> > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: [GENERAL] inserts on views using rules > > I've got a view that combines a couple of tables. The view is meant to > simplify interactions with a Java application, so that selects, inserts, > and updates can be made on the view as if it were a real table. So, I > figured that rules would be the way to go. For inserts, I wrote a > do-instead rule for the view which in turn calls a function. The function > is meant to take the values from the insert statement and stick them into > the appropriate tables. However, functions appear to always return a value > (except as triggers), which confuses the JDBC. So, when I do an insert on > the view, the function is called and returns a value, causing the > following error: > > A result was returned by the statement, when none was expected. > at org.postgresql.jdbc2.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:80) > at > org.postgresql.jdbc2.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:122) > > I take it this is the expected JDBC behavior and not a bug. If so, what > are my options given that functions always return values and triggers > operate before or after inserts, but not instead of them? Is there some > way of calling functions so that they don't return a value? (If this > posting is more appropriate for another mailing list, please let me know.) > Thanks in advance. > > -Stuart Robinson > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: