Re: Constant "JTable" update
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Constant "JTable" update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BEC14DC.20201@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Constant "JTable" update (Jean-Christophe ARNU <arnu@paratronic.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Have you looked at the LISTEN and NOTIFY sql commands in Postgres? I know the jdbc driver has some support for them, but I haven't ever tried to use them so I don't know how or if they work through jdbc. thanks, --Barry Per-Olof Norén wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jean-Christophe ARNU" <arnu@paratronic.fr> > To: <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:38 PM > Subject: [JDBC] Constant "JTable" update > > > >>The straightforward solution seems to have database listeners on the >>table that wakes-up a notifier in the java program. But such kind of >>mechanism seems not to be implemented in the JDBC API (up to my small >>knowledge). >> > > I haven´t seen such a mechanism, either :-) > > > >>The second tortuous solutions (the one I use) is to query the database >>relatively often to get the freshest results. This is quite bandwidth >>consumming (assuming that some users should use a quite small bandwidth >>connection). Using this kind of solution makes the Java application >>slow... >> > First of all, this is how I interpreted your config. > You do a executeQuery once the rendering of the chart is done for one > execution? > And you process the entire ResultSet everytime, even though no changes are > made? > > If this is the case, I would suggest a change in the following direction: > 1. Create a little status table containing just one column: create table > last_change (lastchange datetime). Also add one row to the table > 2. Create a trigger on the measurer table, that updates the date of the > status table. > 3. Design your algorithm something like this > > > check status by executing a select on status table. > > if changed { > store the date from status query > execute data query > render chart > } > > This would reduce the bandwith by not sending the resultset when no changes > are made. > > By measuring the average change in time between , say the last five updates > to the status table, you > could even put the rendering of the chart in its on thread and let it sleep > a little shorter than the average time > > Regards, > Per-Olof Norén > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: