Re: [HACKERS] MD5-based passwords
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] MD5-based passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BEB4D16.4010201@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MD5-based passwords (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I think we need to evaluate each patch on a case by case basis. With that said, there certainly are guidelines we probably should follow: 1) new functionality = next release 2) bugfix (simple or low risk fix) = this release 3) bugfix (complex or high risk fix) = next release (unless it is really important and gets a lot of testing and extensive code review then possibly this release) If we are going to start to see a lot of activity for jdbc (something I am certainly hoping for), we might decide to have a jdbc only release between 7.2 and 7.3 as the next release. We could create a branch in CVS for this work if necessary then release the result on the jdbc.postgresql.org web site. I don't think this work should go into the 7.2.x branch. thanks, --Barry Bruce Momjian wrote: >>We have quite a few code changes which I am unsure about at this point. >>There are quite a few contributions which are coming in right now. I am >>unclear as to how to handle the 7.2/7.3 thing >> > > It is always a tough decision. > > >>I don't want to lose momentum, but I also don't want to put out buggy >>code? >> > > Yep, that is the tradeoff. At this point we usually only add bug fixes > or features that many people really need. > > >>A number of the contributions are implementations of the driver which >>didn't exist before. Since none of the core code is being modified, I am >>tending towards adding them as they com in? >> >>The contributions that I am aware of include >> >>MD5 passwords >>Exported/Imported keys >>Fixes to getTables >> > > The decision is up to you guys now. :-) > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: