Off-Topic: Accounting question
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Off-Topic: Accounting question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BE364F9.4F3CF7A7@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Off-Topic: Accounting question
Re: Off-Topic: Accounting question Re: Off-Topic: Accounting question |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello. I have a quick accounting question. In the evaluation of Cost of Goods Sold, one can use 3 different methods for evaluating inventory: LIFO, FIFO, or Average Warehouse cost. In an application which allows the user to adjust inventory quantities, if the user discovers that the physical inventory in a cycle count is less than the electronic accounts, its easy to attribute the missing inventory as shrinkage. But what if the user discovers an on-hand quantity that is greater than the electronic accounts? For example: Jan 01, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $3.00 Jan 03, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $3.50 Jan 21, 2001 - Bought 1 Pencil for $4.50 Total: 3 Pencils $11.00 However, when the cycle count is performed on Jan 31, 2001, 2 more pencils are discovered. What do Generally Accepted Accounting Principles say regarding the value of the 4th and 5th pencils? If a sale of a pencil occurs on Feb 01, 2001, using LIFO, what is the COGS? Oliver? Sorry for the off-topic question. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: