Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3BD75E18.E971F0A3@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? ("Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron@the-infinite.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > In fact, some could argue that the default behavior of PostgreSQL > > should be changed (or at least have an option) to behave like > > Oracle, where a transaction is implicitly begun at the first > > encounter of an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE - or in PostgreSQL's case, the > > first submitted statement. > If we put in an implicit BEGIN at the start of a connection, when > does it get committed? We certainly dare not do an implicit COMMIT > when the client disconnects, but without that the change would > completely break a lot of existing applications. Ingres solved this with a mode switch; "set autocommit on|off" which is in the style that we would likely use too. It *should* be optional, but settable, and we can debate which should be the default later. When autocommit is "off", the transaction gets committed when you exit or when you explicitly commit. - Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: