Re: Why JDBC 1?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Barry Lind
Тема Re: Why JDBC 1?
Дата
Msg-id 3B950CE2.5050506@xythos.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why JDBC 1?  (Rene Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
One reason is that jdbc2 goes along with Java2.  Thus in the jdbc2 tree
we are allowed to use new methods introduced in jdk1.2.  Whereas in the
jdbc1 tree we are limited to methods available in jdk1.1.

thanks,
--Barry

Rene Pijlman wrote:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
> JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?
>
> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>



В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Barry Lind
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Troubles using German Umlauts with JDBC
Следующее
От: "chris markiewicz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL...