Re: Re: List response time...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Ford
Тема Re: Re: List response time...
Дата
Msg-id 3B85EF3D.90108@blue-labs.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на List response time...  ("Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho@alcor.concordia.ca>)
Ответы Re: Re: List response time...  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

>>Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers.  I see this 
>>delay constantly,on multiple lists.  The bigger the list gets, the slower the 
>>list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)).
>>
>
>Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
>In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
>better choice to handle large mailing lists.  When we switched from
>sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
>sometimes even days, to seconds.
>

It's all in the configuration.  I slam mails around dozens of machines 
in seconds using sendmail and I process a lot of mail.

David




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Ford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Link to bug webpage
Следующее
От: David Ford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: List response time...