Re: Perfomance decreasing
От | Allan Engelhardt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perfomance decreasing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3B798C23.502F4341@cybaea.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Perfomance decreasing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm doing vacuum periodically (once a hour), but perfomance > >> still falls down. > > It sounds to me like you may be running into index growth problems. > VACUUM is presently not good about shrinking indexes. I always enjoy Tom's comments - he is the master of understatement and always helpful. In this case, however, I think he may be understating too much. I read the original question as "PostgreSQL is not usefulfor production systems." Call me melodramatic if you like: you are probably right. The point, I guess, is this: it would be really useful to have a document somewhere that honestly described the limitationsof (the current version of) PostgreSQL. Don't use inheritance, don't use on 24x7 systems, whatever. It doesn'thave to be fancy formatting, a brain-dump to a text file would be excellent.... (This is a hint, Tom et al!! :-)) > If you drop > and recreate the indexes used by your most important queries, does > the performance go back to where it was? For what it's worth: I observed a similar issue and found that a dump and restore of all the databases helped. I haven'ttried just recreating the index. I'll try it out and maybe post a test script to reproduce the issue..... (where?) --- Allan.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: