Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list

OK,  I didn't realize that schema support was part of entry level.
Given that it is, I agree that 'false' is a better response at this
time.  However after schema support is added in 7.3 (hopefully), then I
would like this to be 'true'.  Or are their other large features like
this missing from postgres that are part of entry level 92 that I am not
aware of?

I will submit a patch to add comments to the code reflecting this
discussion.

thanks,
--Barry


Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Barry Lind writes:
>
>
>>  I don't see any problem with claiming support for entry level even
>>though there are a few exceptions.
>>
>
> I might be able to agree if the only exceptions were that we fold
> identifier case the wrong way and have different reserved words, but
> certain things like schemas are rather largish exceptions.
>
> I'm not really sure what the point of this function is anyway.  We could
> leave it as "false" perpetually as a means of protest against the
> contortions of the SQL standard. ;-)
>
>