Re: Postgres Internals
От | Joseph Shraibman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Internals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3B30F59B.4C734D1C@selectacast.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres Internals (Dip <dds98@doc.ic.ac.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Dip wrote: > > Hi All, > > Im running some benchmarking tests on mysql, postgres and interbase > database servers. > > does anyone know the reasons why or know where i can find out some > technical reasons why the postgres database server is particularly good > in relation to the others or just by itself e.g. use of query > optimisation or indexing etc. I'm only looking at creates, selects, > inserts, update and delete statements. I've noticed it is slow at > inserting data into tables, but especially quick at doing complex > selects (i.e. containing many joins). Why is this so? I suspect because on an UPDATE postgres creates a new tuple and lets the old one become invalid. It does this to keep the old tuple around because a transaction that started before the update is supposed to see the old tuple not the old one. Because a new tuple is created it has to be inserted into all the indicies. If another database just has one tuple and overwrites it it doesn't have to update the index. -- Joseph Shraibman jks@selectacast.net Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: