Re: Oracle news article
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle news article |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3B267067.3FC4538C@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Oracle news article ("Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" <thalis@cs.pitt.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle news article
Re: Oracle news article |
Список | pgsql-general |
Interesting. I'm not sure if he gets it. Oracle does have a ton of features that PostgreSQL *currently* lacks: Table spaces Logical Schemas System Privileges Advanced Object Privileges (such as Column privileges) Profiles Auditing Parallel Query Distributed Query, ... and a ton of interfaces and tools, like Pro*Cobol, Pro*Fortran, SQL*Loader, etc. It also does a better job in handling inter-object dependencies. But the question remains: For any given project, are the above features worth the typical Oracle licensing costs? For some, yes they absolutely are. But for many, many others, they aren't. And as time goes on, the PostgreSQL feature list has grown at an accelerating pace. Just my humble opinion, Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com "Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos" wrote: > > http://searchdatabase.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid13_gci562454,00.html > > Check out the question "Do you find open-source database vendors to be a threat to Oracle?" > > cheers, > thalis
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: