Re: 7.2 items
От | Thomas F. O'Connell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.2 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AFC0475.2000500@monsterlabs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 7.2 items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: 7.2 items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones > people were thinking about for 7.2? > > * Allow inherited tables to inherit index, UNIQUE constraint, and primary key > [inheritance] i was wondering if there was any thought still being given to Oliver Elphick's post from a while back that is still in TODO.detail [inheritance]: http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/inheritance/msg00010.html i kind of feel as though the inheritance semantics for postgres at the moment are not fully fleshed out, and including further features without having a full plan for the semantics doesn't seem to advance the effort of making postgres a true Object-Relational DBMS. for my part, as a user, i am excited that inheritance is available even in a limited fashion, but where i use it, i have basically had to invent my own semantics for referential integrity based on a suite of triggers. this issue is addressed in Oliver's post, but i was wondering if such issues were still a part of the development dialogue since Oliver's post was the last in TODO.detail [inheritance] and seemed to merit no response (or any that i could find in the mailing list archives). -tfo
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: