Re: Outstanding patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alessio Bragadini
Тема Re: Outstanding patches
Дата
Msg-id 3AF8EF34.F810203B@albourne.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Outstanding patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: Outstanding patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> But it's not really tracking the variable; with Ian's proposed
> implementation, after
> 
>                 create table foo(bar int4);
> 
>                 create function fooey(foo.bar%type) ...;
> 
>                 drop table foo;
> 
>                 create table foo(bar int8);
> 
> you would still have fooey declared as taking int4 not int8, because
> the type meant by %type is resolved and frozen immediately upon being
> seen.

Ok, this is a more general point: in Oracle (which, as Ian points out,
uses this feature extensively) if you recreate table foo, function fooey
is tagged as 'dirty' and recompiled on the spot next time is used. This
is also true for VIEWs and other objects, so you don't have the problem
we have when a view breaks because you've updated the underlining table.

-- 
Alessio F. Bragadini        alessio@albourne.com
APL Financial Services        http://village.albourne.com
Nicosia, Cyprus             phone: +357-2-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"    -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karel Zak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Следующее
От: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changes needed to build on NetBSD