Re: Time to insert
От | Renaud Thonnart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time to insert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AF167EE.8778EC72@amwdb.u-strasbg.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time to insert (Einar Karttunen <ekarttun@cs.Helsinki.FI>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ok, I will try to do a VACUUM ANALYZE in my program. I suppose it is better to do it too much than too less time.... Many thanks for your help Einar. Renaud Einar Karttunen wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Renaud Thonnart wrote: > > > Thank you Einar and Colin for your help. > > > > I have some little qusetions more : > > > > - How do I interpret a VACUUM ANALYSE ? > > - I'm going to load version 7.1 : what is the difference between 7.1 and > > 7.1rc4 ? > > > 7.1rc4 is the fourth release candidate. 7.1 is the final release. So you > should use 7.1. > > You just send "VACUUM ANALYZE" command to the backend. The vacuum analyze > deletes rows, which are marked as unused and recreates the statistics > about the table. Its use is essential (one time in 2-48h, or after large > modifications), keeps the database running smoothly. You use vacuum > analyze as any other command eg (using libpq++): > > PgDatabase data; > > data.ExecTuplesOk("MISC SQL QUERY") > > // when you need it > data.ExecCommandOk("VACUUM ANALYZE"); > > I think that it is better to do the vacuuming server side, if the > application doesn't change a large amount of data. > > - Einar Karttunen
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: