Re: Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc

Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > > > If there's no objection, I would change the current
> > > > source in a week or so.
> > >
> > > This seems like something to do during 7.2 development, not as part
> > > of post-7.1 bug fixing.
> > >
> >
> > I can wait to commit it if the 7.2 branch is near
> > but have a basic question.
> >
> > What does 7.2 development mean for clients(psqlodbc) ?
> > Certainly 7.2 would require some changes on clients
> > and I would request some features for psqlodbc.
> > But most changes in client libraries are/have been
> > independent from servers' changes. Strong binding to
> > servers' implementation is one of the most abominable
> > thing for clients. Psqlodbc driver has kept backward
> > compatibility and we have always been able to replace
> > the old driver by the latest one. As long as psqlodbc
> > doesn't intend a big change(e.g. ODBC level 3 support)
> > of its own, it doesn't seems to need the branch.
>
> I see you speak about ODBC level 3 support... does everybody
> know that a project named psqlodbc++ has started at
> http://www.greatbridge.org/project/psqlodbcplus

Isn't the project released under GPL not LGPL ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue