Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AD4BECA.6242DFE6@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC
Re: RPM upgrade caveats going from a beta version to RC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Lamar Owen writes: > > > One quick note -- since 'R' < 'b', the RC RPM's must be forced to > > install with --oldpackage, as RPM does a simple strcmp of version > > numbers -- 7.1RC3 < 7.1beta1, for instance. Just force it with > > --oldpackage if you have a 7.1beta RPM already installed. > > Btw., are you aware of the 'serial' tag to override the version guessing > mechanism? Yes, I am, actually. But it seems a broken way of dealing with it. Although I do have another idea, thanks to Trond. Rather than package '7.1RC4-1' I could package '7.1-0.1RC4' -- giving a straight versioning. I could progress from '7.1-0.1beta1.1' through '7.1-0.1beta6.2' through '7.1-0.2RC1.1' to '7.1-1'. Last time I looked at the documentation for the serial tag, its use was strongly discouraged. But that _has_ been awhile -- maybe it could be useful. But I would prefer the whole version numbering thingtobe fixed, as the Debian packages have the same issue -- and I don't know if .deb has an analog to Serial:. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: