Re: Re: Indexes vs indices
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Indexes vs indices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AC8B4EB.7F67096A@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [SQL] Re: pg_dump potential bug -UNIQUE INDEX on PG_SHADOW Dont!! HELP (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > [Dept of swatting flies with sledgehammers] > I'd say that the use of "index" in database work clearly falls under > sense 5b, and so "indexes" is the usual plural according to the OED. As a volume of the OED is about the weight of a small sledgehammer, that fly is one dead puppy (to mix my metaphors). Although, sense 4 is also germane, as our index does serve to direct the query executor to the appropriate tuples, and could be considered to be the directing principle for performance enhancement <duck>...... But in reality, it doesn't matter. 'Indexes' is just fine. It's certainly a better plural than 'Vaxen' was in its time; although I am still inclined to use 'boxen' when referring to more than one computer. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio Professor of English, Anchor Baptist Bible College --so I'm allowed to play with the language.... :-) 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: