Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?
От | DHSC Webmaster |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AC39EAF.59B12C20@dhs-club.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems? (DHSC Webmaster <webmaster@dhs-club.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG 7.0.3 & RH 7 IPC problems?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Gracias, merci' & Thank You Tom! After shutting down the entries were still there. I rebooted and restarted and voila!, we're in business. Tom Lane wrote: > > DHSC Webmaster <webmaster@dhs-club.com> writes: > > [root@atl01371 linux]# ipcs > > > ------ Shared Memory Segments -------- > > key shmid owner perms bytes nattch status > > 0x0052e2ca 36864 postgres 700 144 5 > > 0x0052e2c1 26625 postgres 600 1104896 5 > > 0x0052e2c7 37890 postgres 600 66060 5 > > > ------ Semaphore Arrays -------- > > key semid owner perms nsems status > > 0x0052e2ce 6144 postgres 600 16 > > 0x0052e2cf 6145 postgres 600 16 > > > ------ Message Queues -------- > > key msqid owner perms used-bytes messages > > > These values don't seem to change from one moment to the next although > > there are of course varying numbers of backends running at any given > > moment. > > These objects are created by the postmaster and persist as long as the > postmaster does. They *should* go away when you shut down the > postmaster, but perhaps they didn't for some reason. > > Anyway, I suggest (a) shut down postmaster, (b) use ipcs to make sure > there are no postgres shmem or sema objects (delete 'em with ipcrm if > necessary), and (c) try to start postmaster with new -B/-N values. > > If step (c) fails when there are no pre-existing objects, then it must > be that you have not managed to increase the kernel's limits on shared > memory. The exact incantations needed to accomplish that trick vary > across systems, so I can't offer a lot of help there. > > regards, tom lane -- Bill MacArthur Webmaster DHS Club
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: