Re: create user, user exists
От | Ron Peterson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: create user, user exists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AB39B92.8DA4A574@yellowbank.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: create user, user exists (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: create user, user exists
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Ron Peterson <ron.peterson@yellowbank.com> writes: > > I'm having a bit of authentication trouble. I'm trying to use 'crypt' > > authentication. PostgreSQL 7.1beta5. My pg_hba.conf is as follows: > > IIRC, you can't use crypt with a flat password file, you have to use > plain passwd authentication. (On a local connection there's not much > point in crypt anyway...) > > BTW, it may help to look in the postmaster log; for many authentication > failures, the error message sent to the client is deliberately not > telling all. The message recorded in the log may have additional > details. I misunderstood the difference between 'crypt' and 'password'. I thought they both did a flat password file, and 'crypt' crypted the passwords, and 'password' didn't. Instead, 'crypt' encrypts passwords sent over the wire, and 'password' authenticates against a flat (crypted) password file, rather than pg_shadow. So local+crypt doesn't make a lot of sense, obviously. So now I'm trying to decide whether I want to use 'password' or pg_shadow for user authentication. Using 'password' seems like a broad (and easily managed) brush, while using groups would give me a finer degree of control over permission settings. I'm using ssl for my remote connections, so the whole 'crypt' thing is irrelevant. -Ron- GPG and other info at: http://www.yellowbank.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: