Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions
От | Orion Henry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AB00FF7.4BFA43A0@trustcommerce.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions (adb <adb@Beast.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fast Inserts and Hardware Questions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
adb wrote: > > Have you done any benchmarks with a prototype of your application. > > Based off of some of the numbers I've been seeing with my testing, > I would not be surprised if a single pIII 1ghz box with a decent disk > (ata 100 or scsi 160) would handle the load you describe and is way > cheaper than some big smp box. A dual pIII with a decent raid card > would get you even farther. Certainly these are not as expandable as > other options out there but they are worth a look. > > What I would be most concered about is a table that grows by a few million > rows a week, that to me seems like a liability in itself since > maintenance on that table will get pretty slow after a few months. > > Alex. Right now I have a prototype running on a dual PIII 533 MHz with a scsi raid and I am getting 2 inserts / second maximum. (To be fair there is some overhead I did not mention on each insert but not a lot). Now if WAL or disabling fsync() can get me a 10x speedup that's 20/second which is almost what I need. Perhaps finding a way to drop some of my index's and other overhead could get me to 30/second - my minimum. But yes - it seems that CPU power is the least of my worries. I just need really fast disks and 7.1 to come out soon.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: