Re: Re: beta5 ...

As well as Linux I run Solaris 8 SPARC (32-bit not 64), Solaris 7 SPARC
(SMP, 32-bit not 64), Solaris 7 Intel (both SMP and uni-processor) and
Solaris 8 Intel (both SMP and uni-processor).

I can be counted on to do testing of these as required in about 2 weeks
from now, after I get a new permanent connection here.

With luck I'll additionally have the finances to buy some SPARC 64-bit
machines in a few months.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift
Database Administrator

Tom Lane wrote:
> > What would SF add to this mix?
> 
> The current list of machines at cf.sourceforge.net seems to be
> 
>                  lqqqqqqqChoose compile farm server...qqqqqqqk
>                  x A. [x86] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2)           x
>                  x C. [x86] FreeBSD (4.2-stable)             x
>                  x                                           x
>                  x G. [Alpha] Compaq Tru64 (5.1)             x
>                  x H. [Alpha] Linux 2.2 (RedHat 7.0)         x
>                  x                                           x
>                  x L. [Sparc - E240] Linux 2.2 (Debian 2.2)  x
>                  x M. [Sparc - E240] Sun Solaris (8)         x
>                  x                                           x
>                  x Exit                                      x
>                  mqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqj
> 
> I think I'll go try a build on that Solaris 8 machine, since we've heard
> some reports of problems on Solaris.  However, I'm not sure that we need
> any organized use of their compilefarm.  If they made it easy to
> *automatically* run build/install/regress test on multiple machines,
> I could see the facility being useful (especially so once a few more
> platforms are offered).  But right now it looks like it's just shell
> access to platforms other than your own, which is not going to help us
> all that much.
> 
>                         regards, tom lane