Re: abstract data types?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: abstract data types? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A71ADC1.1D717C6F@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: abstract data types? ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Mr. Reid, > To answer your question, it is a bit hard to say at the moment as the > design schema for our project has only just been started. The draft > versions of the ISO standard that I have seen use an object oriented > data model, so to me it makes sense to try and keep the database schema > as close as possible to this (minimise data impedance). > > Briefly, at its' simplest the schema will probably use a two tier approach. <snip> Let me preface this by saying that I know squat-all about building geometric databases. My background is in db's for accounting, billing, scheduling, and fundraising. Given that .., over the last 3 months, I have become a believer in C.J. Date and Fabian Pascal, who point out quite a few ways that object-oriented and relational approaches to data problems *cannot* be made to reconcile. See http://www.firstsql.com/dbdebunk for some examples of their objections. Of course, Date and Pascal reject Object Oriented approaches entirely, something I'm not ready to do ... but I do see that trying to build a database accessable to both a range of OODB tools and relationally compliant is not achievable. -Josh Berkus -- ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ Josh Berkus Complete informationtechnology josh@agliodbs.com and data management solutions (415) 436-9166 for law firms, small businesses fax 436-0137 and non-profit organizations. pager 338-4078 San Francisco
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: