Re: Re: couple of general questions
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: couple of general questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A697DDE.6A85B236@cupid.suninternet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | couple of general questions (Culley Harrelson <culleyharrelson@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Gregory Wood wrote: > > > Does anyone else get annoyed when going on to an american site to > > register or buy something and find that the state field is only > > 2 characters long? > > Sorry, I didn't realize that many other countries had states... the only > other frame of reference that I have is Canadian Provinces, which also have > 2 character codes. Since we only do business with countries in the United > States and Canada I'm woefully ignorant of international standards. I'd also > like to apologise for our backwards use of the Imperial measurement > system... but that one is not my fault. Umm, sorry. I must have come over somewhat stronger than I intended. It was supposed to be just a passing comment. The reason I picked up on it is because it's the first thing people think of when looking for a reason for fixed length fields and (as pointed out on this thread) it's not even valid for the whole of the US. Personally, for all DB systems I build now I just make *every* text field type text and never use char()/varchar(). Everything time I think I've made it long enough, someone comes up with an example that's longer. The performance difference is marginal or non-existant. Don't think I'm attacking you, I'm just trying to help... -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com> http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: