Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
От | Alvar Freude |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A67ADC8.E673F259@merz-akademie.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database? (Alvar Freude <alvar.freude@merz-akademie.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: is PG able to handle a >500 GB Database?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, Tom Lane schrieb: > > You'd probably find the OID counter wrapping around before too long. > However, as long as you don't assume that OIDs are unique in your data > tables, that shouldn't bother you a whole lot. AFAIK you should be > able to make it work. ok -- the OID-Counter is (still) 4-byte int? As far as I guess now I don't think I need an unique OID -- if Postgres didn't need it! I only need two unique string fields in one table, so it might be a good test if Postgres will be slower with lots of data ... ;-) Ciao Alvar -- Alvar C.H. Freude | alvar.freude@merz-akademie.de Demo: http://www.online-demonstration.org/ | Mach mit! Blast-DE: http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/ | Blast-Dich-Fit Blast-EN: http://www.a-blast.org/ | Blast/english
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: