Re: RE: Why is there so much MySQL bashing???
От | Emmanuel Charpentier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RE: Why is there so much MySQL bashing??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A6615E7.E93A883E@bacbuc.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RE: Why is there so much MySQL bashing??? ("carl garland" <carlhgarland@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
carl garland wrote: > > I think alot of the perceived bashing from the pg community is due > to the fact historically most of mysql's marketing and pr has > been deceptive and outright wrong. After so much crying wolf it is > hard for the village to believe anything the boy has to say. > The majority of open source db installs are running on what the > pg community percieves to be an inferior product. Granted it is > *our* perception but if you look at the breakdown of users of mysql > vs postgres it tends to be professional programmer prefer to use > pg. This is due to the fact that have a more concrete understanding > of the two underlying architectures. Mysql is a fine product for > the majority of users. Why because it works, is easy to work with, > and the momentum is with them, but if you are a looking at a more > rock solid product with a codebase that will approach the demands > that mission critical Oracle like users need PG is vastly closer and > will be the only choice that will most likely perform up to the > standards that an enterprise solution demands. > These opinions are my own but the more informed programmers (PHDs and > such) will probably agree. Sorry to add to the noise, but I must add that, to the best of my knowlege, MySQL currently (my last look on their pages, especially the "crash-me" pages, was about 2 weeks ago) has : - No transactions - No views - No subqueries and is therefore an excruciating pain in the *ss to use for intricated problems (databases using a lot of tables whith highly irregular structures). Furthermore, various reports show that for simple problems (simple-structure databases), MySQL has a better performance under light loads, but that PostgreSQL scales bertter (the degradation of performance with load is much slower). This information I have secondhand, so I cannot commit myself on it. In other words, it seems that MySQL developpers favored high simple-case performance over competence, thus missing the whole point of an RDBMS over an indexed file collection : the ability to find answers to questions not planned at design time. My two (Euro-)cents, Emmanuel Charpentier -- Emmanuel Charpentier
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: