Re: subselects doesn't work in v7.0.3
От | Jose Soares |
---|---|
Тема | Re: subselects doesn't work in v7.0.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A59B1B0.EDB8F72D@sferacarta.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | subselects doesn't work in v7.0.3 (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew McMillan wrote: > pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org wrote: > > > > jose (jose@sferacarta.com) reports a bug with a severity of 2 > > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > > > Short Description > > subselects doesn't work in v7.0.3 > > > > Long Description > > Version: PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc 2.95.2 > > > > - I'm trying the following query in a table with 1973093 rows: > > > > EXPLAIN select count(*) > > from marche > > where ristampa = 'S' > > and marca in > > ( > > select marca from marche where ristampa is null and > > data_lotto between '1998/07/01' and '1999/01/31' > > ); > > > > NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: > > Aggregate (cost=98854229180.08..98854229180.08 rows=1 width=4) > > -> Seq Scan on marche (cost=0.00..98854229130.75 rows=19731 width=4) > > SubPlan > > -> Materialize (cost=50101.13..50101.13 rows=6577 width=12) > > -> Seq Scan on marche (cost=0.00..50101.13 rows=6577 width=12) > > EXPLAIN > > > > - but it takes to many time: (after about 16 hours I interrupt the query) > > This is a known bug with IN ( ... ) and the use of indexes - you would > get better results using EXISTS. Yes. EXISTS works. PostgreSQL takes 9.720 secs against DBMaker 7.145 secs Thank you very much Jose' > > > Cheers, > Andrew. > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > Andrew McMillan, e-mail: Andrew@catalyst.net.nz > Catalyst IT Ltd, PO Box 10-225, Level 22, 105 The Terrace, Wellington > Me: +64 (21) 635 694, Fax: +64 (4) 499 5596, Office: +64 (4) 499 2267
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: