Re: replication followup
От | Sandeep Joshi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication followup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A563118.7941E432@zambeel.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replication followup (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: replication followup
Re: replication followup |
Список | pgsql-general |
How do we get it? I want to test the product. Sandeep > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Justin Banks wrote: > > > Hello - > > As a followup to my mail about replication yesterday, I've > > realized that I can make replication bi-directional, with each > > (non-replicant master initiated) connection to a backend it's own > > master with respect to that connection and all data modifications made > > within it. In order to do that, though, I need to add items to the > > structs Port (be) and PGconn (fe). After I do that, the asynch stuff > > would just fall into place, and the performance should impove. My > > question is whether there is anything I should be really careful of > > when modifying these structs? I'm not sure if there is code that uses > > byte offsets or something into these structs, so any warnings would be > > much appreciated. > > > > On a related note, does anyone know what the status of ER's > > replication is? > > It was comitted to the source tree, under contrib, before Xmas, and will > be in the beta2 distribution schedualed for this weekend ...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: