Re: Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A41C7BA-C2D2-468A-962E-DEA546529256@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak? (ljb <ljb1813@pobox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Anyone testing changes to libpq/bcc32.mak?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I don't know that anybody does. We usually get a report a couple of minor versions in and fix it then, which backs that guess. It's also not tested by the buildfarm. So I think you can call it semi- maintained at best. So if you want to become the maintainer and test/send patches at an earlier stage, please go right ahead! /Magnus On 7 apr 2009, at 03.52, ljb <ljb1813@pobox.com> wrote: > There were some recent changes to libpq/bcc32.mak that broke my > attempt to > build libpq with the Borland compiler. (OK, not so recent. I've been > busy.) > Five new modules were added from ports/: dirent dirmod pgsleep open > win32error > I had to removed two, dirent.c and open.c to get the compilation to > work. > > CVS comment on the changes (Rev 1.30, 1.28.2.1) is: > "Synchronize Borland libpq makefile to match MSVC. Backpatch to > 8.3.X." > > So: Are changes to libpq/bcc32.mak being tested, or just applied > assuming they > are correct? Because if they are tested, I'm getting different > results and we > need to compare notes. If the changes are not tested, I will submit > a patch > that works for me. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: