Re: RE: version numbers of WinODBC
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RE: version numbers of WinODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A40F1B4.B2133F73@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RE: version numbers of WinODBC (Kovacs Zoltan Sandor <tip@pc10.radnoti-szeged.sulinet.hu>) |
Ответы |
Re: RE: version numbers of WinODBC
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
> Is it possible to autogenerate the version numbers from PostgreSQL source > configuration? I think the reason why the WinODBC driver has a separate > version number is that it can be compiled directly using the > src/interfaces/odbc/ directory only, so if someone wants to compile the > DLL only, he/she can do it. By the way, if we support this (we must, of > course), autogenerating version numbers doesn't seem to make sense, it > must be set "by hand". Since the cvs repository is now the "truth copy" of the code, the standalone tarballs could be generated by a build process in src/interfaces/odbc which explicitly finds and copies the current pgsql version info. Once the tarball is built, then the version info travels with the tarball. I'm not sure what the state of the standalone build is at the moment; it used to work but I vaguely recall some discussion that it was evil... - Thomas
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: