Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A33764A.8375864D@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas? (Andrew Snow <als@fl.net.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Snow wrote: > > Could you perhaps post the code you have for splitting a text field up into > keys, then I could work on turning into a new type of index with a new > operator, as Tom suggested? > > (Or is this already what the text search code in contrib already does??) I think that splitting the text is the least of the problems. I've been contemplating integrating my own (currently BSDDB based) full-text-index with postgresql and I've come to the conclusion that the index proper should work on already split list-of-words (so it could be made to work with any array types easily) So my suggestion is to start working on an inverted-index on a field of any array type. Or even better - start digging in the indexing interface of PostgreSQL first documenting it (the current docs just state that it is too complicated for anyone to comprehend ;) and then cleaning it up and making it thus making it easyer for any kind of new index to be written. ------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: