Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
| От | Joe Kislo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3A26D23C.B32F1C80@athenium.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre ("Joel Burton" <jburton@scw.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unanswered questions about Postgre
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Joel Burton wrote:
>
> On 30 Nov 2000, at 11:58, Joe Kislo wrote:
> > If you don't believe me, here's two fully SQL-92
> > compliant databases, Oracle and interbase, which do not exhibit this
> > behavior:
>
> Ummm... havings lots of experience w/it, I can say many things
> about Oracle, but "fully SQL-92 compliant" sure isn't one of them. :-)
Nice! I was just reading some article benchmarking Postgre against
interbase.. They said interbase was fully SQL-92 compliant, so I just,
well gosh, assumed it's expensive brotheren were compliant too :)
Does anybody know of an article benchmarking interbase against postgre
7? The article I was reading was comparing it to postgre 6.5. I assume
(hope) there have been some serious speed improvements since then?
-Joe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: