Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh)
| От | Lamar Owen |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3A01E1E2.D345A6CD@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > What really got my ire up was that this change was committed several > days *after* core had agreed that 7.0.3 was frozen and ready to go except > for updating the changelog, and that it was committed with no prior Now that I've seen the back story, I must agree. > The early returns from pghackers seem to be that people favor just > dropping the script into /contrib and not worrying about how well > tested/documented it is. If that's the consensus then I'll shut up > ... but I do *not* like the way this was handled. Bruce I believe has made a good call -- it goes in contrib for now, and gets yanked for 7.1, which _might_ have the same functionality as a pg_dump/pg_dumpall option (which will then get wrung out on beta testing). But I agree -- I'm not thrilled with the method. The functionality itself sounds nice -- but I know we need a solid 7.0.3 out. New functionality belongs in 7.1. Until beta -- and then a freeze there. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: