Re: 7.0.x RPMs
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.0.x RPMs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39F6FD48.45ABC680@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 7.0.x RPMs (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Someone reported a problem with /usr/include/pgsql/os.h and the > underlying linux.h. I see a broken link for os.h, and somehow linux.h > does not appear, though on the surface the spec file seems to be doing > the right thing. > I'm working with 7.0.2-3mdk (which is the same as your 7.0.2-3). Do you > see this too, or has it been fixed in a subsequent version? I don't have a 7.0.2-3. It has been fixed in a subsequent version. Please upgrade your RPM installation to the latest rpm-3.0.x from Mandrake, then pull postgresql-7.0.2-19.src.rpm from rawhide. You will need to upgrade RPM because that src.rpm is in v4 format. Yes: 7.0.2-_19_. Trond has been busy :-). I am working on back porting, amongst other issues. There has been discussion about _why_ this is happening. Opinion seems to be that 'make install' should be copying the port-specific file to os.h instead of symlinking. What would your opinion be? Subsequent versions (which haven't yet been uploaded to postgresql.org yet due to a number of issues) simply include linux.h in %files for -devel. I will have a backport to RH 6.2 of -19 done by the end of this week (being paid to do it, so I had better do it!), and will upload that. Oh, Thomas, since the permissions on the PPC subdir in binary are such that I can't delete the PPC RPMS, can you delete them and post a README that there are serious problems with the LinuxPPC binary build currently posted on PostgreSQL.org? We need to get them rebuilt with -O2 or less. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: