Re: prefer (+) oracle notation
От | Claudio Jose Zanardi Grillo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: prefer (+) oracle notation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39F037C0.36FF5ADE@certi.ufsc.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | prefer (+) oracle notation ("Edmar Wiggers" <edmar@brasmap.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Excuse me, I should have written : I t seems to be ambiguous !!! too ... Claudio. Claudio Jose Zanardi Grillo wrote: > Hi, > > The Sybase notation for outer joins seems to be good too: > > *= > or > =* > > Claudio > > Edmar Wiggers wrote: > > > I'm not sure about the standard, but I really like Oracle's notation for > > foreign keys: > > > > select a.item_number, b.group_code_description > > from items a, group_codes b > > where a.group_code = b.group_code (+); > > > > Much better than > > > > select a.item_number, b.group_code_description > > from items a outer join group_codes b on a.group_code = b.group_code; > > > > In fact, it's MUCH BETTER when you have to join several tables (one thing > > PgSQL is very good at, by the way). In such cases, the seconde syntax > > requires an unreadable lot of ()'s in the from clause. > > > > Don't mean to throw away the standard though, but having Oracle's (+) syntax > > around too would be a big help.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: