Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joseph Shraibman
Тема Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch
Дата
Msg-id 39E4A84E.7741C8C6@selectacast.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch  (Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>)
Ответы Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch
Список pgsql-interfaces
Peter Mount wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Michael Stephenson wrote:
> 
> > Two things.
> >
> > Firstly, when dealing with a large ResultSet (about 120000 rows), I get a
> > null pointer exception on the line:
> >    wasNullFlag = (this_row[columnIndex - 1] == null);
> > Whenever I call getString(), has anyone else had this? And does anybody
> > have a solution?
> 
> Are you getting any out of memory errors at all?
> 
> The problem with the current implementation is that it reads the entire
> result into memory, so 120000 rows may be filling up your VM's memory
> (defaults to about 16Mb).
> 
> Does it occur if you add the -mx argument to java, ie:
> 
>         java -mx 64m uk.org.retep.sql.RetepSQL
> 
> I'm in the design stage of implementing a version of ResultSet that will
> use cursors, to limit how much is loaded in memory at a time.
> 

The problem with that is the same problem I ran into with locking.
cursors need to be in a BEGIN END block, and other calls from different
Statement objects using the same db connectioni will interfere.  Make
sure it is clearly documented that that will not be thread safe (unless
postgres gets named locks by then).


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Diller
Дата:
Сообщение: accessing arrays from jdbc
Следующее
От: Peter Mount
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC Large ResultSet problem + BadTimeStamp Patch