Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39D4ADE3.C1068A14@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Talking with other Dbases. ("Daryl Chance" <dchance@valuedata.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > "Alfredo" <csib@mweb.com.na> writes: > > I heard that MySQL is included in RH 7 instead of PgSQL. Is this > > true? > No. Postgresql is included, and is the one installed when choosing > "SQL Server" under the custom category. To get MySQL, you would have > to install them manually afterwards, select "everything" or choose to > manually select packages. Not to mention that the MySQL packages are the GPL'd 3.23 _alpha_ code. > Of course, we may switch the defaults in the future if we think MySQL > is a better database in terms of upgradability, reliability, features > and performance but there are no such plans right now. And PostgreSQL's reliability, features, and performance are sterling -- and the replication server being developed by PostgreSQL, Inc helps. But, upgradability is, well, almost nonexistant. No, dump/initdb/restore is not a real upgrade; it's a kludge (and doesn't necessarily work). I know one datamodel in particular that is currently having problems with databases restored from a pg_dump. We'll see if the 7.1 pg_dump helps. Currently, MySQL has us beat on the upgradability issue. And I cannot overemphasize how important a smooth upgrade is to a distribution maker like Red Hat. I am looking at the feasibility of the upgrade utility I mentioned a few weeks ago, and am finding it rough going. But, we'll see. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: