Re: Large Objects
От | Tim Kientzle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39C93E13.E65D3402@acm.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Large Objects ("Steven Lacroix" <lacroix@newwaveindustries.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Large Objects
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Steven Lacroix asks: > ... what kind of performance hits do BLOBS have on a database ... > Note that it would be for web database project. I haven't tried this with PostgreSQL, but I ran some experiments to compare the speed of access for large numbers of BLOBs stored in a single MySQL table and in a directory in the local filesystem. For more than 10,000 BLOBs, the database was a clear winner. That is, it took less time to locate and read an 8k-16k BLOB from the MySQL database than from the local disk. For smaller numbers of BLOBs, the filesystem was faster. This is pretty much what you should expect: reading a file through a system call should be faster than doing a network operation to request a BLOB. Conversely, Unix filesystems store directories as unsorted lists, which are a lot slower to search than the database's structured indexes. I'm currently working on a web publishing system that stores all content as BLOBs in a back-end MySQL database; performance is very good so far. I'll be giving a talk about this at BSDCon in Monterey next month with more details... - Tim Kientzle
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: