Re: PL/java
| От | Zé Rui Marques |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/java |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 39BE0035-414A-4DC4-B2DB-C2DBFB2B778A@carrotincentives.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/java (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
My concern is a purely commercial, in this case.
We work only for “large” companies. Only telecommunications operators (more than 5 million subscribers)
In this environment the “IBM / SAP / Accenture” effect is very strong - “I chose the leader, it is not my fault that it failed”
So, having something like PL/java when it is not “supported” by anyone with a markeatable name is always a barrier.
Furthermore, if it is not in the Postgres.org supported things, it will not be available in AWS RDS service, AWS Aurora, Azure xyz, Citus…, which limits our deployment options.
Thanks,
On 07-12-2020, at 14:45, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote:Hi,
I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised ETL platform.
Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting everything to Postgres.
All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of our code within the database to be also in java.
The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official procedural language. If so, when?
None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is not going to help you. What is your concern?Thanks,
*—*
*Zé Rui Marques*
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: