Re: Fragged State in 7.0.2
От | Tim Perdue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fragged State in 7.0.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39B65F62.D8E051F5@valinux.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fragged State in 7.0.2 ("Mike Mascari" <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It doesn't suprise me that it doesn't work, but I am surprised to get into a half-baked state if an abort does happen for some reason. NOTICE: Caution: DROP TABLE cannot be rolled back, so don't abort now Probably what should happen is it should error out if you try to do things like this in a transaction, or autocommit for you no matter what. Whatever it takes to not be in a half-baked state. Tim Tom Lane wrote: > > "Mike Mascari" <mascarm@mascari.com> writes: > > Rolling back DDL statements properly > > in a MVCC transaction environment is very difficult, as > > you can imagine. IIRC Oracle cheats, Informix and DEC Rdb > > lock the DDL target until transaction commit, etc. If > > the PostgreSQL team implements their stated goal in this > > area, it will be far superior to its commercial counterparts. > > AFAIK we intend to keep the current behavior of exclusively > locking any table you try to drop or modify. So it'll be > pretty much like the Informix/RDB behavior. > > But yes, at the moment DROP or RENAME inside a transaction is > pretty risky (and 7.0 tells you so, with an annoying NOTICE). > > regards, tom lane -- Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com Lead Developer - SourceForge VA Linux Systems 408-542-5723
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: