Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
От | Mark Hollomon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39ACFE8E.CCFAB07B@americasm01.nt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backend-internal SPI operations (Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Backend-internal SPI operations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Mark Hollomon" <mhh@nortelnetworks.com> writes: > > > Just out of curiousity, is there technical reason there isn't > > > a (say) relisview attribute to pg_class? > > > > That might indeed be the most reasonable way to attack it, rather > > than having to go messing about looking for a matching rule. > > (Jan, any thoughts here?) > > The right way IMHO would be to give views another relkind. > Then we could easily > > 1. detect if the final query after rewriting still tries to > INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE a view - i.e. "missing rewrite > rule(s)". This appeals to me. The current silent no-op behavior of INSERT/DELETE on a view is annoying. -- Mark Hollomon mhh@nortelnetworks.com ESN 451-9008 (302)454-9008
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: